Comments on: Re-engineering the wall between church and state http://timwindsor.com/2008/12/14/re-engineering-the-wall-between-church-and-state/ Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:25:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: sulumits retsambew http://timwindsor.com/2008/12/14/re-engineering-the-wall-between-church-and-state/comment-page-1/#comment-833 sulumits retsambew Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:23:40 +0000 http://timwindsor.com/?p=662#comment-833 I appreciate Brogans point. I appreciate Brogans point.

]]> By: Adrian Monck http://timwindsor.com/2008/12/14/re-engineering-the-wall-between-church-and-state/comment-page-1/#comment-193 Adrian Monck Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:14:41 +0000 http://timwindsor.com/?p=662#comment-193 Separation of duties does have something going for it. There's no reason someone I trust shouldn't audit their own books... I take Brogan's point as expressed above but whilst he may feel he has the integrity to make such arrangements work, not everyone does. Self-audited standards soon stop being standards. Separation of duties does have something going for it. There’s no reason someone I trust shouldn’t audit their own books…

I take Brogan’s point as expressed above but whilst he may feel he has the integrity to make such arrangements work, not everyone does. Self-audited standards soon stop being standards.

]]> By: Shaneen Clarke http://timwindsor.com/2008/12/14/re-engineering-the-wall-between-church-and-state/comment-page-1/#comment-1437 Shaneen Clarke Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:25:25 +0000 http://timwindsor.com/?p=662#comment-1437 I have read Chris side on his site and I'll go with him. He sounds reasonable enough on what he thinks is nothing wrong. I have read Chris side on his site and I'll go with him. He sounds reasonable enough on what he thinks is nothing wrong.

]]> By: Shaneen Clarke http://timwindsor.com/2008/12/14/re-engineering-the-wall-between-church-and-state/comment-page-1/#comment-1256 Shaneen Clarke Sun, 21 Dec 2008 07:25:25 +0000 http://timwindsor.com/?p=662#comment-1256 I have read Chris side on his site and I'll go with him. He sounds reasonable enough on what he thinks is nothing wrong. I have read Chris side on his site and I'll go with him. He sounds reasonable enough on what he thinks is nothing wrong.

]]> By: Shaneen Clarke http://timwindsor.com/2008/12/14/re-engineering-the-wall-between-church-and-state/comment-page-1/#comment-191 Shaneen Clarke Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:25:25 +0000 http://timwindsor.com/?p=662#comment-191 I have read Chris side on his site and I'll go with him. He sounds reasonable enough on what he thinks is nothing wrong. I have read Chris side on his site and I'll go with him. He sounds reasonable enough on what he thinks is nothing wrong.

]]> By: gus http://timwindsor.com/2008/12/14/re-engineering-the-wall-between-church-and-state/comment-page-1/#comment-188 gus Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:53:52 +0000 http://timwindsor.com/?p=662#comment-188 eep. bad idea, chris. there are other ways you can make money, even if you're a one-man blogging crew. just get kmart to sponsor your work -- you don't have to write about them. if you're a popular blogger connecting with the young hipsters, they should be itching to serve up ads in front of their eyeballs. eep. bad idea, chris. there are other ways you can make money, even if you're a one-man blogging crew. just get kmart to sponsor your work — you don't have to write about them. if you're a popular blogger connecting with the young hipsters, they should be itching to serve up ads in front of their eyeballs.

]]> By: BusbySeo http://timwindsor.com/2008/12/14/re-engineering-the-wall-between-church-and-state/comment-page-1/#comment-187 BusbySeo Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:28:27 +0000 http://timwindsor.com/?p=662#comment-187 Je pense que les principales questions est la peinture n'importe qui avec un blog comme un journaliste. Un journaliste doit être aussi «pur» que possible par tous les moyens, mais combien d'écrivains sur des sites Web et des blogs sont activement engagés dans quelque chose qui pourrait être décrit comme de journalisme d'actualité et se présenter en tant que tel? Je pense que les principales questions est la peinture n'importe qui avec un blog comme un journaliste. Un journaliste doit être aussi «pur» que possible par tous les moyens, mais combien d'écrivains sur des sites Web et des blogs sont activement engagés dans quelque chose qui pourrait être décrit comme de journalisme d'actualité et se présenter en tant que tel?

]]> By: Notes from a Teacher - Sunday squibs http://timwindsor.com/2008/12/14/re-engineering-the-wall-between-church-and-state/comment-page-1/#comment-186 Notes from a Teacher - Sunday squibs Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:44:55 +0000 http://timwindsor.com/?p=662#comment-186 [...] Re-engineering the wall between church and state. Does a sponsored post at a popular blog damage the author’s credibility? Should the rules for the big guys apply to the smaller? Tim Windsor asks some questions, and makes some points, about the ad/editorial divide. [...] [...] Re-engineering the wall between church and state. Does a sponsored post at a popular blog damage the author’s credibility? Should the rules for the big guys apply to the smaller? Tim Windsor asks some questions, and makes some points, about the ad/editorial divide. [...]

]]> By: Dan Thornton http://timwindsor.com/2008/12/14/re-engineering-the-wall-between-church-and-state/comment-page-1/#comment-185 Dan Thornton Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:08:19 +0000 http://timwindsor.com/?p=662#comment-185 I think the main issues is painting anyone with a blog as a journalist. A news journalist should be kept as 'pure' as possible by all means, but how many writers on websites and blogs are actively engaged in something that could be portrayed as news journalism and portray themselves as such?<br><br>A blog is simply a website in chronological order, and therefore we shouldn't be attempting to judge anyone on the grounds of ethical newswriting unless they are covering something in that particular approach. As a journalist, I always tried to remain an impartial and unbiased as possible (within the limits of being human!), but now that I'm in marketing and blogging, should I avoid any product placement or advertising? Am I compromised by having Google ads, or an Amazon affiliate link? I think the main issues is painting anyone with a blog as a journalist. A news journalist should be kept as 'pure' as possible by all means, but how many writers on websites and blogs are actively engaged in something that could be portrayed as news journalism and portray themselves as such?

A blog is simply a website in chronological order, and therefore we shouldn't be attempting to judge anyone on the grounds of ethical newswriting unless they are covering something in that particular approach. As a journalist, I always tried to remain an impartial and unbiased as possible (within the limits of being human!), but now that I'm in marketing and blogging, should I avoid any product placement or advertising? Am I compromised by having Google ads, or an Amazon affiliate link?

]]>